Reconstruction of proximal humeral fractures without screws using a reinforced bone substitute
نویسندگان
چکیده
Multi-fragment fractures are still a challenge: current clinical practice relies on plates and screws. Treatment of the proximal humerus has intra-operative risk articular damage when inserting multiple Distal-varus collapse head is frequent complication in osteoporotic patients. The aim this biomechanical study was to investigate if an Innovative-cement-technique (the screws replaced by injection cement) provides same or better stability reconstructed compared Standard-technique (locking screws). A four-fragment fracture simulated twelve pairs humeri, with removal part cancellous bone simulate “eggshell” defect. One each pair repaired either plate, 2 cortical 6 locking screws), (injection partially-resorbable reinforced substitute consisting PMMA additivated 26% beta-TCP). Cement performed both lab under fluoroscopic monitoring. specimens were tested failure cyclic force increasing amplitude. withstood 3.57 times larger than contralateral Standard reconstructions before started. maximum final for 3.56 Standard-technique. These differences statistically significant. Innovative-cement-technique, based substitute, demonstrated properties findings, along advantage avoiding possible complications associated screws, may help safer more effective treatment case multi-fragment humeral fractures.
منابع مشابه
Locking plate fixation with and without inferomedial screws for proximal humeral fractures: a biomechanical study.
PURPOSE. To compare the efficacy of locking plate fixation with and without inferomedial screws in maintaining the reduction of a proximal humeral fracture. METHODS. 22 synthetic humerus models were used. A standardised 3-part proximal humeral fracture with a 4-mm wedge segment was created and fixed with a locking plate and screws with (n=11) and without (n=11) inferomedial screws. The intrafra...
متن کاملPlating of proximal humeral fractures.
The optimal treatment for proximal humeral fractures is controversial. Few data exist concerning the influence of the surgical approach on the outcome. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plate fixation through a deltopectoral vs an anterolateral deltoid-splitting approach. Of 86 patients who met the...
متن کاملProximal humeral fractures: current controversies.
According to Horak and Nilsson, 5% of all fractures of the human body are fractures of the proximal humerus. Palvanen et al reported an increase in these fractures of more than 3-fold between 1970 and 2002. Court-Brown et al found that 70% of all 3and 4-part fractures are seen in patients aged over 60 years and 50% in patients aged over 70 years. These results indicate that poor bone quality or...
متن کاملBiomechanical effects of calcar screws and bone block augmentation on medial support in locked plating of proximal humeral fractures.
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effects of medial fracture gap augmentation in locked plating of an unstable 2-part proximal humeral fracture with calcar screws and insertion of a corticocancellous bone block. Furthermore the mechanical behavior of dynamic locking screws in the non-parallel arrangement of a proximal humeral plate was of interest. ME...
متن کاملOsteosynthesis of Proximal Humeral End Fractures with Fixed-angle Plate and Locking Screws: Technique and Results
UNLABELLED Describe the results of proximal humeral fractures surgically treated with the Philos locking plate system. METHOD Between March 2003 and October 2004 we prospectively reviewed 24 of 26 patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with a Philos plate. The mean follow-up time was 12 months and the mean age of patients was 57 years. Six patients had four-part proximal humerus fra...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Biomechanics
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0021-9290', '1873-2380']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110138